Herbs & Botanicals

Evidence overview

Rhodiola

Rhodiola rosea (golden root) is one of the better-studied adaptogenic herbs, with a clinical literature concentrated on stress, mental fatigue, athletic performance (especially endurance), and mild-to-moderate depression. The research base is moderate in size - smaller than ashwagandha, larger than many other herbal supplements. Standardization to salidroside and rosavin content varies substantially across products, which complicates trial-to-trial comparison.

Or browse all supplements

The research base is moderate in size - smaller than ashwagandha, larger than many other herbal supplements. Standardization to salidroside and rosavin content varies substantially across products, which complicates trial-to-trial comparison.

Most studied for

Cognitive performance

119 studies

PubMed coverage

445 studies

Across all indexed goals

Safety profile

Moderate

Based on 54 safety studies

Mechanism class

Adaptogenic herb traditionally used in Russian and Scandinavian folk medicine. Active compounds include salidroside...

Study coverage

Study coverage by goal

PubMed counts for Rhodiola grouped by the goal each study targets.

Rhodiola445 studies on PubMed
Your report covers:Cognitive Performance & Neuroprotection · Mood, Stress & Neurological Well-being · Dosage & Protocol · Safety (54 studies)

Evidence

What the evidence covers

What's been studied. Conclusions live in the full report.

Rhodiola rosea (golden root, arctic root) is one of the better-studied adaptogenic herbs, with a clinical literature spanning stress and burnout, mental fatigue, mild-to-moderate depression, athletic performance and recovery, and cognitive function under fatigue or sleep deprivation. The herb has been used in Russian and Scandinavian folk medicine for centuries; modern research uses standardized root extracts, most commonly the SHR-5 extract that dominates the European trial literature. Active compounds include salidroside (a tyrosol glucoside) and rosavins (phenylpropanoids); the salidroside-to-rosavin ratio is one of the standardization markers but is not consistent across products.

The outcome dimensions covered most heavily are stress and fatigue symptoms (the registered traditional use in Europe), mental fatigue and cognitive function under demanding conditions, athletic performance (particularly endurance, where the literature has focused on perceived exertion and time-to-exhaustion outcomes), mild-to-moderate depression (a smaller research stream), and adaptive resilience to acute physical or psychological stressors. The mechanistic emphasis on the HPA axis and monoaminergic systems connects rhodiola to the broader adaptogen category and shapes much of the field framing.

Demographically, the European literature concentrates heavily on healthy adults under occupational stress (the dominant trial population), with secondary research streams in athletic populations, students under examination stress, and clinical anxiety/depression. Product standardization is a major practical issue: trials variously use products standardized to 3% rosavins / 1% salidroside (a common market specification), 6% rosavins, or pure salidroside, and these are not interchangeable. Trial duration is typically 4-12 weeks, similar to other herbal-supplement trials and shorter than ideal for establishing long-term effects.

What the studies found for the goal you choose is in our full report.

Safety

Safety summary

Common adverse events, drug interactions, and special populations.

Rhodiola is generally well-tolerated in clinical trials. The most-reported adverse events are mild gastrointestinal discomfort, dry mouth, dizziness, and occasional headache. Nervousness and insomnia are also reported. No established tolerable upper limit. Drug interactions are only partly characterized: one human study found modest CYP2C9 inhibition (relevant to losartan, warfarin, and phenytoin), case reports describe reactions with antidepressants (MAO inhibition is shown in vitro), and interactions with stimulants and antihypertensives remain theoretical. Use during pregnancy and breastfeeding is not recommended (EMA monograph); people with bipolar disorder or on antidepressants should consult a clinician.

This summary is informational and not medical advice. Consult a clinician before starting or changing any supplement, especially if you take prescription medications.

Our full report covers the doses used in studies, drug interactions and contraindications, and what those studies found for the goal you choose.

Foundations

Foundation of the evidence base

A few studies the field anchors on. Not the full picture, just the starting points.

  • Systematic review with molecular interpretationAnnals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 2026Synthesis across rhodiola and Withania trials

    Recent systematic review of adaptogen RCTs with molecular interpretation of psychometric outcomes. Most included trials are on ashwagandha (19 of 24), but it's the most-current systematic review covering Rhodiola's adaptogenic claims.

    View on PubMed
  • Systematic review of randomized controlled trialsPhytotherapy Research, 202313 RCTs, 263 participants (no pooled analysis)

    Systematic review on Rhodiola's effects in sports performance, covering endurance, anaerobic exercise, and perceived exertion. A reference for one of Rhodiola's widely promoted consumer uses beyond stress and fatigue, since extended by a 2025 meta-analysis of 26 RCTs.

    View on PubMed

Limitations

What this page doesn't answer

Where the public summary stops and the full report begins.

This page summarizes the Rhodiola literature at a general level. It does not address which extract (SHR-5 ratio, higher-rosavin formulations, or pure salidroside) is right for your specific goal, what dose has been shown effective for your use case, the appropriate timing of administration (morning typically, due to occasional stimulant-like effects), or how Rhodiola interacts with the medications you take (especially antidepressants). Product standardization variability is the single most-practical question for this supplement, which makes the personalized report especially useful here.

Label to evidence

More than Rhodiola on the label?

Photograph the Supplement Facts panel and Veraflux reads every ingredient printed on it, including the ones a proprietary blend lists without doses, then pulls the published research on each. A free account covers 15 ingredients a month, enough for a full label.

Goal-specific evidence

Get the full Rhodiola report

Your free monthly report adds the things this page doesn't: per-goal evidence breakdown, full citation list, and a safety section covering all adults, opening with a short plain-language summary so you can orient in seconds before drilling in. On Starter, the report is written for your age and sex too.

A free report every month. No credit card. Cancel anytime.

Get notified when new evidence appears

We'll email you when the literature on Rhodiola materially updates. No account required.

The human-verification check couldn't load, possibly because of a browser extension. You can still submit; if it doesn't go through, try disabling your blocker for this page.